Frane Adam / 8. 6. 2020
On 11 March, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that the new corona virus had become a pandemic, namely an epidemic that started in Wuhan, China, had grown into dimensions that threaten most of the world. After 3 months, one can take stock of how individual countries and regions have coped with the pandemic. Introduced measures have mostly been similar: quarantine, border closure, restricted movement and travel, restricted gatherings and the complete cessation of certain business activities. The only countries in Europe not to have followed this route are Belarus and Sweden.
Erhard Busek / 28. 5. 2020
Many thanks for the first contribution to the Forum for the Humanities. What are you intending to do to make it a real instrument of exchange of ideas?
Werner Wintersteiner / 25. 5. 2020
Times of crisis are moments of learning. They are therefore also times of political dispute: What is the significance of the events? Which measures have proven effective? How should things continue after the crisis?
Jean Grondin / 25. 5. 2020
For intellectuals and academics, at least those blessed with relatively good health, the lockdown is not necessarily a major inconvenience, nor all that unusual. Descartes conducted his meditations isolated, or alone with God, by his fireplace. Our own secular age is now rediscovering the virtues of monasticism.
Erhard Busek / 12. 5. 2020
I think the first step should be to analyze, which right and wrong directions we are within the discussion of the corona crises. I would say, there were a lot of wrong comparisons for example to compare it with the results of the World War II.
Peter Hanenberg / 26. 5. 2020
It is not uncommon for politics and the media to refer to crises as wars. It helps frame the situation and concentrate efforts on fighting a cause, the more so as this cause is a living organism with an identity: Sars-CoV 2.
Babette Babich / 25. 5. 2020
There is tremendous disquiet all around — enough for a lifetime and a half, lived and unlived. But in this time of crisis, scholars otherwise keen to pick through Heidegger’s Nazi enabling complicity, attuned to what he said or wrote — or failed to say or failed to write — find themselves repeating currently standard government edicts.
Bernhard Waldenfels / 14. 5. 2020
Ein überraschend auftretender Virus ist etwas, das uns widerfährt, bevor das Für und Wider einsetzt. Wie kann man davon reden, ohne es wegzureden? Was kann ein Philosoph dazu beisteuern?
Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
+386 12444587 (Andrej Božič)
Forum for the Humanities (FORhUM) operates under the auspices of Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities (INR; Ljubljana, Slovenia), the activities of which are financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS; Ljubljana, Slovenia) within the research program P6-0341, the research project J7-8283, and infrastructure program I0-0036.